2026 Fixed Income Outlook: Stay Calm and Keep Your Carry On

Steven Oh, CFA
Co-Head of Leveraged Finance

Timothy “Tim” Rabe
Head of Public Fixed Income
We believe that amid myriad fear-provoking headlines, fixed income investors should stay calm and stay invested in 2026 – favoring a stable but cautious approach that focuses on maintaining diversified yield and carry in portfolios rather than seeking outsized excess returns. While credit markets should be buoyed by improving economic conditions next year, current tight valuations may limit upside potential.
Despite fears that recent isolated bankruptcies may only be the most visible “cockroaches” in the banking and credit markets or indicate a more systemic “termite problem” in the foundation of the system, we view any blowup in the credit cycle as highly unlikely barring a major economic downturn (which we likewise don’t expect).
The influence of AI and related capital expenditures on market dynamics is a key area to watch, with Big Tech beginning to fund AI build-outs with debt (particularly at the very long end) rather than relying solely on internal cash flow.
We favor maintaining some US investment grade (IG) exposure, particularly in the intermediate part of the IG curve, though we think diversification into other geographies – such as UK gilts, long-end Japanese government bonds, select emerging market local currencies and hard currency corporates, and parts of Europe – is prudent to maintain yield and hedge against risks.
We continue to view the yield advantage of the bank loan and high yield bond markets to be attractive, though both are fully valued overall. While we believe CLOs’ total return potential looks attractive relative to similarly rated fixed income assets, tight valuations tilt us toward an incrementally more defensive portfolio bias.

Investors would be forgiven for worrying that credit issues may be looming: Recent isolated but high-profile bankruptcies have raised alarms that more such “cockroaches” may be hiding in the banking and private credit sectors – and have spawned fears of a more widespread “termite problem” eating away at the underlying financial system. Yet we think concern about these potential bugs in the system are likely overblown, and that the credit problems are indeed idiosyncratic and not a broader systemic concern. The one apparent common thread relates to the utilization of structured asset-backed and off-balance-sheet financings.
Our more optimistic, if still cautious, view is that credit markets and their infrastructure remain solid and will be buoyed by improving economic conditions in 2026, driven by supportive fiscal and monetary policy, US tax cuts and deregulation, and, critically, ongoing AI expansion – a key area to watch.
While current tight valuations can limit upside potential in fixed income in 2026, we believe investors should stay calm and stay invested, focusing on maintaining yield and carry in portfolios rather than seeking outsized excess returns. That said, we think it’s critical to maintain a level of dry powder to deploy in the event that a pullback creates compelling opportunities.
Here we share our views on what investors should be watching across fixed income markets in 2026.
Diversification is key in investment-grade credit and rates, with AI shifting dynamics
We have recently witnessed a marked shift within investment grade (IG) issuance, from the financial companies that had long dominated the market to a steep rise in tech-oriented issuers. Big Tech is beginning to fund AI build-outs with debt (particularly at the very long end) rather than relying solely on internal cash flow – a trend that could continue among technology titans and introduce correlation risk with equities due to the concentrated nature of AI investments. The explosion in AI-related issuance introduces both challenges and opportunities for investors, requiring careful fundamental security selection to identify the winners and to manage the increased risk, and we expect this theme to gain prominence as tech becomes a much larger part of the US IG index.
AI Fuels a Surge in Tech Debt Issuance
AI-related net supply

Source: Bloomberg and Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research as of 15 December 2025.
Looking into 2026, we favor maintaining investment grade (IG) credit exposure at more neutral levels, particularly in the intermediate portion of the US IG curve, which we prefer over longer durations. While US credit and its underlying fundamentals have long been viewed as superior to other developed markets, the differential has been shrinking – and given the tight valuations, we think it prudent to reduce any substantial overweights to the US and move toward more neutral exposures. Furthermore, the favorable credit profile and stability of investment grade emerging market corporates could make such allocations a de-risking proposition on a strategic basis over the medium term, contrary to the false perception that they add risk.
Indeed, investors may be well served to diversify beyond US government debt to include UK gilts, long-end Japanese government bonds, and select European and emerging market local currencies – particularly in Latin America (Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Chile). EM investment grade debt has outperformed in 2025 and remains relatively cheap going into next year, which suggests it could offer select opportunities for attractive excess returns compared to pure US credit. Notably, the banking sector across emerging markets is generally well-positioned to withstand downside risks in the global economy, and while rate cuts have reduced profitability, these cuts factor into a stable economic outlook that supports loan quality and liquidity across the system.
A balanced approach to leveraged finance
Our outlook on leveraged finance is broadly neutral, with high yield bonds and leveraged loans fairly valued overall, and we continue to emphasize balanced and diversified risk exposure. We believe it’s important for investors to maintain some dry powder that can be deployed opportunistically during potential market pullbacks – for instance, by holding assets such as single-A rated CLO tranches, which offer yields comparable to those of BB rated high yield bonds but with lower credit risk.
We believe high yield bonds remain an attractive asset class in a diversified portfolio, with all-in yields adequately compensating investors for credit risk amid moderate default expectations. We view valuations as broadly fair in the context of our 2026 economic outlook, which would be supportive of reasonably tight valuations.
High yield continues to offer attractive risk-adjusted yields relative to equities, where price/earnings ratios remain elevated, volatility is likely to persist, and earnings growth and capital expenditures are concentrated in a small cohort of companies. With its more compelling yields, we view the belly of the high yield market – low BB to mid-B rated bonds – as a sweet spot for investors, and we believe default risk remains low in aggregate and is concentrated in select companies and industries facing secular or structural pressures.
We are becoming more cautious on issuers tied to lower-income consumers, which may experience more pressure in the current K-shaped economy. Overall, we expect positive, carry-based total returns for high yield bonds (but muted excess returns) and believe defaults could tick a bit higher in 2026, albeit from low current levels.
Yields on High Yield Bonds Remain Attractive

Source: Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Bond Index as of 13 October 2025.
Leveraged loan issuer fundamentals remain relatively stable, with leverage and other credit metrics on a healthy footing after multiple quarters of stable revenue and earnings growth. That said, performance for the asset class could be susceptible to shifts in top-down views on the economy’s expected trajectory due to the growth in the mid to low single-B segment of the market. However, the default rate, including liability management exercises (LMEs), is expected to dip slightly in 2026, and issuer fundamentals will be aided by recent and expected Fed rate cuts. However, this will reduce coupon yields and erode the current yield advantage over comparably rated high yield bonds.
The increasing dominance of collateralized loan obligation (CLO)-related demand for loans also results in a demand gap for issuers that are downgraded to CCC, along with the emergence of a K-shaped market appetite for loans. If loan spreads were to widen more broadly – for instance, as a result of severely negative sentiment related to the job market or consumer health – we would expect increased opportunities to generate alpha through credit selection. However, any downside surprises in economic activity versus current forecasts would most likely justify further rate cuts, providing additional relief for issuer fundamentals.
While loans underperformed other fixed income assets in 2025 due to the lack of yield curve benefit, our expectation is that loans will be among the top fixed income assets once again in 2026.
In European loans and high yield, the underlying picture is more nuanced, with dispersion widening as the market increasingly splits between resilient issuers and a growing tail of credits under pressure. Weakness is most evident in sectors such as chemicals and building materials, where earnings softness persists, and among highly leveraged names facing the prospect of a default or LME. Yet despite increasing idiosyncratic volatility, we expect the broader market to continue to tick along steadily, and limited refinancing pressure should keep defaults contained. European loans plot as among the most attractive fixed income assets for 2026, but challenging liquidity and negative convexity for a sizable portion of the market persist.
We believe CLOs offer attractive opportunities to keep your carry on relative to other equivalently rated fixed income assets amid current conditions. Institutional demand for CLOs remains robust, and CLO ETFs saw more than 20 consecutive weeks of inflows through mid-October before experiencing some reversals heading into year-end. Despite likely headline-driven volatility in the coming months, we believe risks are balanced, though tight valuations tilt us toward an incrementally more defensive bias. We believe a nimble and robust bottom-up approach to security selection is paramount given the dispersion in the loan market, in which certain CLO portfolios holding weaker credits may eventually experience impairments to the lowest-rated debt tranches – which could result in attractive opportunities to move down the capital stack.
Credit should benefit from slow and steady growth in 2026
Fixed income markets tend to thrive in periods of low and steady growth, without extremes – conditions that align with our supportive central case scenario for 2026.
While we will be keeping an eye to structural shifts and emerging risks in credit markets – particularly the impact of AI-related issuance and stress in lower-income segments – we think investors need not be alarmed by idiosyncratic credit issues, or fear that they portend a credit cycle explosion. We view such an outcome as highly unlikely barring a major economic downturn (which we likewise don’t expect).
In a market that we view as fairly priced and stable, fixed income investors will benefit from a cautious but constructive approach that balances yield retention with diversification across geographies and sectors.
For more insights into the trends moving markets in the coming year, see our 2026 Investment Outlook.

Disclosure
MetLife Investment Management (“MIM”), which includes PineBridge Investments, is MetLife, Inc.’s institutional investment management business. MIM is a group of international companies that provides investment advice and markets asset management products and services to clients around the world. The various global teams referenced in this document, including portfolio managers, research analysts and traders are employed by the various legal entities that comprise MIM.
All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal; no guarantee is made that investments will be profitable. This document is solely for informational purposes and does not constitute a recommendation regarding any investments or the provision of any investment advice, or constitute or form part of any advertisement of, offer for sale or subscription of, solicitation or invitation of any offer or recommendation to purchase or subscribe for any securities or investment advisory services. The views expressed herein are solely those of MIM and do not necessarily reflect, nor are they necessarily consistent with, the views held by, or the forecasts utilized by, the entities within the MetLife enterprise that provide insurance products, annuities and employee benefit programs. The information and opinions presented or contained in this document are provided as of the date it was written. It should be understood that subsequent developments may materially affect the information contained in this document, which none of MIM, its affiliates, advisors or representatives are under an obligation to update, revise or affirm. It is not MIM’s intention to provide, and you may not rely on this document as providing, a recommendation with respect to any particular investment strategy or investment. Affiliates of MIM may perform services for, solicit business from, hold long or short positions in, or otherwise be interested in the investments (including derivatives) of any company mentioned herein. Views may be based on third-party data that has not been independently verified. MIM does not approve of or endorse any republication of this material. This document may contain forward-looking statements, as well as predictions, projections and forecasts of the economy or economic trends of the markets, which are not necessarily indicative of the future. Any or all forward-looking statements, as well as those included in any other material discussed at the presentation, may turn out to be wrong.



